Joanna Christoforou

Experience

Antitrust/Competition

At Hausfeld, Joanna is part of the legal team:

• Filing a representative collective action with the CAT on behalf of the Consumers’ Association (known as Which?) against Qualcomm on behalf of a class of around 29 million UK consumers alleging that Qualcomm abuses its dominance in the markets for smartphone chipsets and standard essential patents, the result of which is that Qualcomm is able to overcharge smartphone manufacturers like Apple and Samsung for its technology. Damages are estimated to be over £480 million.
• The opt-out collective action filed with the CAT on behalf of an estimated 19.5 million eligible UK users of smartphones and tablets running on Google’s Android operating system relating to excessive and unlawful charges on purchase in the Google Play store. The claim alleges that Google unfairly restricts consumers from accessing potential competition from other app distributors, by requiring smartphone manufacturers to pre-install a bundle of Google’s proprietary apps and services including the Google Play Store as well as imposing other contractual and technical restrictions.

Prior to Hausfeld, Joanna:

• Acted for a leading national retailer in its claim against Visa for damages at the UK High Court and Court of Appeal and in its 2020 landmark victory at the UK Supreme Court, which upheld the Court of Appeal's 2018 judgment in favour of the retailer’s claim that Visa’s UK multilateral interchange fee was an unlawful restriction of competition under UK and EU law; prior to the relevant proceedings there had been no English or EU ruling that Visa’s interchange fee was a restriction of competition
• Acted for a leading pharmaceutical company at the High Court and Court of Appeal in the first-ever challenges to the CMA’s search and seize warrants brought under Section 28 of the Competition Act 1998
• Acted for a leading pharmaceutical company in its successful appeal in the CAT against the CMA’s infringement decision relative to market exclusion and pay-for-delay in relation to Hydrocortisone, having also acted in the administrative proceedings relative to the same
• Acted for a leading pharmaceutical company in its appeal in the CAT against the CMA’s infringement decision alleging abuse of dominance by charging unfair and excessive prices in relation to Liothyronine, having also acted in the administrative proceedings relative to the same
• Acted for a leading pharmaceutical company in its successful appeal in the CAT against the CMA’s infringement decision relative to market sharing and market exclusion in relation to Prochlorperazine, having also acted in the administrative proceedings relative to the same
• Successfully advised clients against director disqualification proceedings pursued by the CMA
• Acted in numerous investigations into suspected complex cartels, anticompetitive agreements and abuse of dominance pursued by the European and UK agencies, including relative to Nitrofurantoin and other medicines, credit default swaps, Libor and Euribor, Forex, with a successful outcome for the clients in many of these
• Acted for a Fortune 500 company in its internal investigation into suspected market sharing and price fixing and its application for immunity or leniency to enforcement agencies, including the European Commission
• Advised a global tobacco manufacturer in its successful appeal to the CAT in 2011 against the OFT’s decision and record fine in respect of alleged anticompetitive retail pricing practices; the infringement decision was annulled by the CAT
• Served as a Blue Book stagiaire at the European Commission’s Directorate General for Competition

Pro Bono

In 2024, Joanna was recognised as part of the newly launched Pro Bono Recognition List, published annually, which celebrates solicitors and barristers who have dedicated 25 or more hours of pro bono legal assistance in the previous calendar year.

She has worked on the following cases:

• For Amicus, a not-for-profit organisation which represents individuals facing the death penalty in the United States, Joanna has led teams supporting US counsel representing a number of individuals on death row, including in a case in which prosecutors subsequently dropped the death penalty
• Co-led a team assisting Reprieve, a human rights not-for-profit organisation, in relation to a pro bono study on the appeals system in a jurisdiction